Broadband Law Advisor Blog : Broadband Lawyers & Attorneys : Davis Wright Tremaine Law Firm : National Broadband Plan Adoption & Infrastructure Updates

The FCC has released its agenda for its April 7 Open Meeting.  As announced in its tentative agenda, the April 7 meeting will include adoption of an order altering FCC regulations governing pole attachments.  As we wrote earlier, this order will likely address most of the outstanding issues left over from the FCC's May 2010 pole attachment order, including attachment rates for telecom carriers and access and enforcement issues.

Other items on the agenda include:

• Report and Order on CMRS data roaming arrangement;
• Report and Order to detect and prevent fraud in provision of video relay service;
• Notice of Inquiry on access to government rights of way and wireless facility siting requirements;
• Notice of Inquiry on communication network reliability standards; and
• Proposed Rulemaking on gaps in wireless coverage;

 

 

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

 On Dec. 23, 2010, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) released its Report and Order (R&O), and the text of the net neutrality rules it adopted on Dec. 21, 2010. The rules are summarized in our prior advisory, but the R&O contains many important details and nuances. (For the full text of the order, see Report and Order).

 

Transparency

The R&O offers a detailed illustration of the wide ranging disclosure that wireline and wireless providers must provide of commercial terms, performance, and network management practices. The sample disclosure includes “typical frequency of congestion” for networks that manage congestion; how any specialized services may affect the last-mile capacity available for, and the performance of, broadband Internet access service; third-party device and application approval procedures for mobile broadband providers; security mechanisms; details on any inspection of network traffic, and the storage or transfer of such data; and practices for resolving end-user and edge provider complaints and questions. 

(Continue reading)

 

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

This morning at its monthly open meeting, the Federal Communications Commission adopted net neutrality rules which largely adopt existing Internet traffic and management practices, impose new non-discrimination and transparency rules, but leave room for specialized or managed services and usage based billing. The order is notable for basing jurisdiction mostly on Title I and ancillary jurisdiction, rather than reclassifying broadband as a Title II common carrier service. (The order has not yet been released but we will include a link here once it is made available to the public, along with a DWT Advisory analyzing the order in more detail.  UPDATE: Fairly detailed press release is available on the FCC website, as well as the Commissioners' statements.)

As expected, the vote was adopted on a 3-2 partisan vote. Democratic Commissioners justified the order as a compromise necessary for maintaining the Internet as an open platform where innovation may occur without seeking permission, while providing certainty conducive to investment at the edge as well as in the broadband network core. In vigorous dissent, Republican Commissioners questioned any need for departing from the successful history of building and maintaining an open Internet by leaving it largely free of government regulation.
 

Continue Reading...

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Earlier today, Chairman Genachowski held a press conference to deliver his remarks on his proposed Open Internet rules, which are scheduled for vote at the FCC's December 21 open meeting.  The Chairman prefaced his summary of the rules by noting that they are in principle rooted in policy statements of past "Republican" Chairmen Powell and Martin, is consistent with President Obama's goal of keeping the Internet "open and free", and builds upon the framework first developed by Rep. Waxman earlier this year. 

In summary, the Chairman outlined the basic concepts of his proposal that grants consumers and innovators the right to:

1. Transparency, including basic information about how networks are managed;
2. Send and receive lawful Internet traffic (ie, prohibit blocking), and use devices (that are not harmful to the network) of their own choosing; and
3. A level playing field, including a bar to unreasonable discrimination in content transmission;

The rules also recognize providers' right to "reasonable" network management that will give providers the flexibility to address congestion and "illegal" traffic, as well as maintain incentives to build-out and innovate broadband networks.

The Chairman made clear that the rules do not adopt the "reclassification" option that would have reclassified broadband as a Title II service.

Also, the Chairman's rules draw a distinction between mobile and fixed broadband services.  The Chairman acknowledged that mobile services are still at an early stage of development, but are rapidly evolving so that the FCC will be prepared to act in the event that anti-competitive or anti-consumer practices arise.

UPDATE: The FCC has just released a statement by Commissioner McDowell condemning the Chairman's proposal.  His brief statement is available here.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Last night the FCC released its tentative agenda for its next open meeting to be held December 21.  Two items are scheduled for consideration, the first being an Order (not a rulemaking or inquiry) adopting Open Internet rules, also known as net neutrality.  The text summarizing the agenda item is as follows:

Open Internet Order: An Order adopting basic rules of the road to preserve the open Internet as a platform for innovation, investment, competition, and free expression. These rules would protect consumers’ and innovators’ right to know basic information about broadband service, right to send and receive lawful Internet traffic, and right to a level playing field, while providing broadband Internet access providers with the flexibility to reasonably manage their networks.

Chairman Genachowski also circulated his proposal to the other FCC Commissioners late last night In anticipation of the December meeting to vote on the Order. 

The FCC website indicates that the Chairman will deliver remarks on his proposal, which is expected to begin at 10:30 am today.  A live webcast is available on the FCC's website at http://reboot.fcc.gov/live/.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Last week saw announcements by NTIA Administrator Strickling and FCC Chairman Genachowski which turn the current broadband plan focus back towards freeing up airwaves for wireless broadband services.

The NTIA will recommend that the federal government reallocate 115 MHz of spectrum – currently used for weather satellite and military radar systems – for wireless broadband. This represents a starting point towards the goal of reallocating 500 MHz of spectrum for broadband over the next 10 years. Among the bands identified for reallocation are 1675-1710 MHz, which could be paired with the unauctioned AWS-3 band, and 3550-3650 MHz, which is adjacent to an allocation previously designated for WiMAX and other wireless broadband deployments.

The FCC plans to take up three wireless spectrum items at its November open meeting. First, the FCC will propose rules for “incentive auctions” designed to financially reward certain spectrum licensees (primarily broadcasters) for relocating or ceasing operations to make room for expanded wireless broadband networks (more on that at our sister site, the Broadcast Law Blog). Second, the FCC will propose rules expanding its experimental licensing program to make it easier for research and development efforts to field test new wireless technologies. Finally, the FCC will inquire into how new wireless communications advancements, such as sensing technologies or improved spectrum databases, could facilitate more opportunistic uses of spectrum via secondary markets and dynamic spectrum leasing arrangements.
 

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

In adopting its Second Memorandum Opinion and Order during yesterday's open meeting, the FCC is pressing forward with its plan to allow unlicensed fixed and mobile wireless devices to operate in unused parts of TV spectrum (the TV “white spaces”).  According to FCC Chairman Genachowski, this is the first significant block of spectrum made available for unlicensed use in more than 20 years.

Yesterday’s unanimous decision modified certain provisions of the FCC’s November 2008 White Spaces Order (a copy of which is available here; and discussed in detail in an earlier DWT Advisory) in response to seventeen petitions for reconsideration. While the Second Memorandum Opinion & Order upholds the majority of the FCC’s findings in the 2008 White Spaces Order, the Commission did make some widely anticipated changes to the original rules.

Eliminated the Device Sensing Requirement - First, the Commission revised a portion of a two-part requirement that the new white space devices use sensing technology that can detect when spectrum is actually being used, and consult with an incumbent spectrum user database when a device seeks to locate available white space for transmitting its signal. The Commission eliminated this “belt and suspenders” approach and determined that the device sensing requirement will no longer be mandatory – just encouraged. The FCC also indicated that it has not yet selected the private companies that will administer the geolocation database of incumbent spectrum users. Further, the FCC’s Office of Engineering & Technology still has to finalize technical standards relating to the database.

Additional Interference Protection - The Commission also revised its original rules to provide additional interference protection to existing white spaces spectrum users, which are predominantly TV broadcasters and wireless microphone users. Specifically, the revised rules now will reserve two vacant UHF channels on a nationwide basis for wireless microphone use. In addition, the revised rules will allow large users of wireless microphones (users of more than 12 microphones), such as Broadway shows and sports stadiums, to register for protection in the incumbent spectrum user database, but the registration must have been done in advance of the event and the public will be given the opportunity to review and comment on the request. Further, the revised rules will maintain a separation distance between TV white space devices and wireless microphones permitted to be registered in the database.

Cable Headend/TV Translator Protection Issue - The original rules provided that cable headend and TV translator receive sites located beyond 80 km from the edge of a television station's protected contour cannot register for protection in the incumbent spectrum user database. In yesterday’s Order, the Commission recognized that cable headend, TV translator and other MVPD receive sites beyond that 80 km distance may also need protection. Under the revised rules, operators of such sites can petition for inclusion within 90 days of the effective date of yesterday’s order. It is possible that if such requests are not opposed that they would summarily be granted. If an operator misses that window, it would be much more difficult to obtain protection for preexisting sites, so operators should consider now whether they have such sites and if they wish to request protection.

Chairman Genachowski seemed to indicate that the FCC would press forward with its implementation of the White Spaces plan regardless of the pending legal challenges filed against the 2008 White Spaces Order by the broadcast industry.
 

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Today the FCC released a Public Notice seeking comments on what the FCC calls the "business broadband marketplace."  While this comment cycle is not directly related to any current FCC proceeding (the docket number - WC Docket No. 10-188 - was only created yesterday), the magnitude of information sought hints at the establishment of future regulatory policies, if not rules, regarding broadband service offerings to businesses, that may impact aspects of other Commission broadband initiatives.  Indeed, the Public Notice suggests that the Commission intends to institute regulatory policies over the business broadband marketplace, stating up front that the "business broadband marketplace...requires policies that enable...competitive retail markets, incentives for investments in facilities, and access where competitive infrastructure cannot be economically deployed."  In addition, the Public Notice indicates that the Commission recognizes that "[d]ifferences in the technology used to provide a particular service may cause that service to be subject to significantly different policies, which may undermine competition policy objectives."  This seems to suggest that the Commission prefers a single, uniform policy over broadband business services, regardless of the transmission, technology or facilities used.  (The Public Notice could also be a precursor to the Commission's forthcoming rulemaking in Q4 of this year regarding the collection and analysis of industry-wide data on key broadband metrics (subscribership, prices, performance) for business (and retail) customers.)

Basically, the Commission wants to know everything about "the universe of business broadband service inputs, where they are available, and how they are used."  The Public Notice specifically identifies a number of issues for which it seeks further information, including, among other things, (1) the different types of transmission services, technologies and facilities used to provide business broadband; (2) the various combination of services, technologies and facilities used; (3) trends in the business broadband marketplace, including pricing and technology trends; and (4) the impact of non-traditional marketplace participants (e.g., cable and wireless) and non-carrier wholesale customers (e.g., consumer electronics companies embedding broadband services in their devices) on the marketplace.

Comments are due October 15, 2010.  Reply comments are due November 4, 2010.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Yesterday the Federal Communications Commission announced that its recent Open Internet Public Notice, which seeks comment on two "under-developed issues" in the Open Internet Proceeding, was published in the Federal Register, thus setting the comment cycle for this public notice.  Comments are due October 12 and reply comments are due November 4.

As we discussed earlier here, the Open Internet Public Notice is part of the Open Internet proceeding, which was initiated on October 22, 2009 and designed to impose “network neutrality” rules on Internet service providers, including nondiscrimination obligations, limits on network management techniques, and disclosure requirements. This Public Notice seeks additional comments regarding (1) "managed" or "specialized" services, and (2) open Internet principles for mobile wireless services.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

This week the Federal Communications Commission issued three important items related to the National Broadband Plan, and broadband services generally. 

On September 1, the Commission issued a Public Notice to initiate a Further Inquiry Into Two Under-Developed Issues In The Open Internet Proceeding (GN Docket No. 09-191, and WC Docket No. 07-52).  The original Open Internet NPRM (which we discussed at length here) was released October 22, 2009 over two partial dissents, and was designed to impose “network neutrality” rules on Internet service providers, including nondiscrimination obligations, limits on network management techniques, and disclosure requirements.  As discussed in more detail in the Public Notice, comments submitted in this and other proceedings have prompted the Commission to further solicit public discussion regarding two "complex" issues that were addressed "in less detail" than other issues in the NPRM.   First, the Commission seeks additional comments about concerns and policies related to "managed" or "specialized" services.  The NPRM had appeared to be more sensitive to allowing innovation in IP managed services outside of Open Internet regulations, so the Further Inquiry could affect the regulations as originally proposed. 

Second, the Commission seeks additional comment on "how, to what extent, and when" its "openness principles" should apply to mobile wireless services.  The Public Notice specifically noted the fact that, since the NPRM was released in October, recent developments warranted updating the record on certain questions related to wireless, namely, the emergence of new business models by certain wireless carriers to introduce pricing plans that charge different prices based on consumers' level of data consumption, and Verizon's and Google's recent proposal for open Internet legislation that would exclude wireless.

Today, the FCC released an Order extending the deadline for filing reply comments in its pole attachment rulemaking proceeding (WC Docket No. 07-245) to Monday, October 4, 2010.  Reply comments previously were due on September 13, but in response to a petition for extension filed by an industry organization representing electric utilities, the Commission decided to extend the deadline by three weeks.

Also today, the Commission released its tentative agenda for its September open meeting.  According to the release, the Commission intends to discuss four items: (1) TV White Spaces Second Memorandum Opinion and Order; (2) E-Rate Broadband Order; (3) E911 Location Accuracy Second Report and Order; and (4) E911 Location Accuracy FNPRM and NOI.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Following up on our post from last week, the FCC’s NPRM and NOI on ways to improve regulation of microwave wireless spectrum used for the “backhaul” transport of network traffic focuses in many parts on the need to balance efficient use of the wireless spectrum with measures to ensure facilities can be deployed quickly. Last Thursday’s FCC action begins implementation of one of the spectrum initiatives set forth in the National Broadband Plan. This initiative aims to remove regulatory barriers to the deployment of wireless backhaul links, which constitute a critical piece of the system architecture of broadband networks. Among other uses, backhaul can be used for linking wireless cell towers to the wired broadband networks.

The NPRM proposes three rule changes: removing spectrum use restrictions, altering technical rules, and changing licensing requirements. First, the FCC proposes to eliminate the service-specific restrictions on certain microwave frequency bands used for the Cable TV Relay Service (CARS) and Broadcast Auxiliary Service (BAS). This includes a proposal to open up the largest current CARS band – the 500 MHz allocation at 12.7 to 13.2 GHz – for alternative uses. While the CARS and BAS bands are currently designated for the transport of video programming by cable television system and broadcast stations, the proposed change would allow any parties to apply for FCC licenses in those spectrum bands for microwave backhaul of any kind of traffic. Similarly, the FCC proposes to eliminate a rule which prohibits broadcasters from using general fixed microwave spectrum to deliver video to studios when BAS frequencies are available. In proposing these changes, the FCC emphasized that no existing CARS or BAS license would be altered, and that any new users would be required to coordinate with existing licensees in these bands. The FCC asked for comment on a variety of aspects of this proposal, including whether opening up these bands would have an adverse impact on cable operators’ future use of CARS spectrum.

Next, the FCC proposes a minor change to allow for “adaptive modulation” technology, which can reduce signal fading and allow microwave signals to propagate further. The use of adaptive modulation requires temporary departures from the minimum payload capacity requirement for wireless traffic delivery, a rule designed to ensure microwave spectrum is being fully utilized. Under the proposal, the minimum payload thresholds need not be met while signal fading is occurring to allow parties to take advantage of the modulation technique.

Finally the FCC proposes a set of rule changes to allow the addition of “auxiliary stations” to existing microwave authorizations. Under the current rules, microwave applicants must provide specific site-based information to the FCC to obtain a license, and the FCC will issue authorizations only for the applied-for paths, frequencies, and antennas. Under the proposed rule, a holder of a microwave license for a given path and set of frequencies would be allowed to add multiple new antenna sites to an existing authorization, either on a conditional authority or blanket authority basis. This would allow license holders to “re-use” their authorized frequencies with additional antennas surrounding the licensed link, similarly to how mobile wireless licensees currently re-use spectrum within an area by transmitting signals from multiple base station antennas simultaneously. Proponents of the rule changes claim it will allow for more efficient microwave spectrum use, while opponents have expressed concerns that the changes could lead to congestion in the microwave bands and unacceptable interference to existing users. 

In the NOI the FCC asks whether rural broadband service deployments in particular could be accelerated by eliminating or revising certain microwave spectrum efficiency standards and antenna design requirements. The FCC noted that it often gives waivers of the capacity requirements for rural microwave systems to allow them to provide better service at lower cost through less efficient transmission standards, which would be impractical in heavily-trafficked urban environments but are acceptable where spectrum demand is lower. Along the same lines, the FCC asks whether it could revise its technical standards for microwave frequency usage (at least in certain bands or areas) so that smaller and more inexpensive antennas could be used without creating interference problems that would offset any gains from accelerated network deployments.

Comments and reply comments are due 60 and 90 days after publication of the item in the Federal Register.
 

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The FCC has commenced a proceeding to facilitate the use of spectrum for wireless backhaul and other point-to-point and point-to-multipoint communications, increasing the efficient use of spectrum for backhaul, and providing for the more flexible use of microwave frequencies to promote the deployment of wireless broadband and other services.  In an NPRM, the Commission seeks comment on proposals to increase the utilization and provision of increasing flexibility in microwave spectrum.  The NOI component of the proceeding seeks more generally comments on other proposals for more cost-effective and intensive use of microwave spectrum.  Initial comments will be due 60 days from publication in the Federal Register; reply comments will be due 90 days from publication.  More detailed analysis of this proceeding will be posted shortly. 

The FCC has also commenced a proceeding related to its Hearing-Aid Compatibility rules.  As we noted earlier, this proceeding foreshadows the impending passage of new federal legislation designed promote access to advanced communications, including Internet video, by the disabled community, discussed below. 

The Commissions has issued a Policy Statement basically declaring that people with hearing aids and cochlear implants should have access to advanced technologies, including modern smartphones.  In a Second Report and Order, the Commission clarified a number of issues related to its hearing aid compatibility rules, including that the rules apply to devices that have built-in speakers designed to be held to the ear; requiring disclosure of information about multi-band and multi-mode phones that operate in part over bands or modes for which technical standards have not been established; and amending the rules requiring manufacturers to deploy hearing-aid compatible handsets to apply to handsets sold through all distribution channels, not only through service providers.  Finally, in an NPRM, the Commission seeks comment regarding customer equipment used to provide wireless communications over any type of network; a requirement for some or all retail outlets to offer consumers in-store testing of hearing-aid compatible devices; and user-controlled reduction of power to meet standards for operations over legacy GSM interfaces in the 1900 MHz band.  The Commission also noted that it intends to initiate a comprehensive review of its wireless hearing aid compatibility rules later this year.  Initial comments will be due 45 days after publication in the Federal Register; reply comments will be due 75 days after publication.

The Hearing Aid Compatibility proceeding is especially significant given the recent passage of House and Senate accessibility legislation.  As noted earlier, House Bill 3101, Rep. Markey's "Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2009" was adopted by the House and received in the Senate on July 27, 2010.  More recently, on August 5, it was read twice and placed on the Senate legislative calendar for consideration. 

At the same time, Sen. Pryor's companion bill (S. 3304), which we first mentioned here and here, was replaced by a substitute version proposed by Sen. Reid on August 5.  That version was agreed to and passed by the Senate by unanimous consent that same day.

With the House Bill now on the Senate's calendar, and the Senate having passed its version of the bill, passage of new accessibility legislation is expected very shortly.  As previously explained in detail, the new legislation is expected to update the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) by requiring advanced services and devices to be ADA-compliant, including Internet videos and mobile devices, and will reinstate the FCC's video description rules.  Accordingly, this legislation, when passed, will have a significant impact on manufacturers, content providers, and programming distributors, to name a few.   As soon as Congress passes the legislation, we will provide an in-depth look at what changes the legislation will make to the Communications Act and the FCC's ADA rules, among others.

For additional information about the legislation, please contact Maria Browne or Brian Hurh.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

As anticipated from the Commission's earlier tentative agenda, the agenda for the August 5th open meeting, released on Thursday, confirms that the Commission intends to initiate two proceedings this month.  The first is a hearing-aid compatibility Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that will seek to require modern advanced telephone voice communications devices to be compatible with hearing-aids.  As discussed earlier, this proceeding is a precursor to the Commission's goal of making broadband services and applications, including Internet video, accessible to the disabled community.  This proceeding will also follow on the heels of the House of Representative's recent passage of Rep. Markey's "Twenty-first Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2009" (HB 3101), which we first talked about back in May, along with the companion bill S.3304 (Pryor).  On July 26, House Bill 3101 was easily adopted by a vote of 348 to 23, and the next day it was received in the Senate, where it is expected to pass.  As we discussed earlier, House Bill 3101, which is cited numerous times throughout the National Broadband Plan, would extend hearing aid compatibility requirements to "advanced services" (including non-interconnected VoIP and text messaging) and to manufacturers of devices for such services, as well as reinstate the FCC's "video description rules."

The second agenda item is a wireless backhaul Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Notice of Inquiry that will seek to "remove regulatory barriers to the use of spectrum for wireless backhaul and other point-to-point and point-to-multipoint communications, in order to lower the cost of backhaul services and accelerate investment in broadband networks throughout the nation."

• Email This
• Print
• Share Link

The FCC has released its tentative agenda for its August 5th open meeting.  Like its July meeting, this one is fairly light, with only two agenda items scheduled for adoption.  One is a proposed NPRM and NOI which will "seek to remove regulatory barriers to the use of spectrum for wireless backhaul and other point-to-point and point-to-multipoint communications, to promote broadband competition and investment in rural and non-rural areas."  This issue was recommended by the National Broadband Plan, as we discussed earlier.

The other agenda item is not directly related to broadband, but can be seen as perhaps a precursor of things to come.  The second agenda item involves a Report and Order and FNPRM to ensure that advanced voice communication devices are hearing aid-compatible.  This comes during the FCC's celebration of the 20th anniversary of the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), which has recently become both a political and industry issue.  As we discussed earlier, both the House and Senate are currently considering similar bills that would update the ADA to require advanced services and devices be ADA-compliant, including Internet videos and mobile devices, as well as reinstate the FCC's video description rules.  The Senate bill (S.3304, Pryor) was recently moved out of subcommittee to the Senate Commerce Committee on July 15.  Similarly, the House bill (HR 3101, Markey) was heard and marked-up by the House Subcommittee on Communications, Technology and the Internet, then forwarded to the full Committee on Energy and Commerce on June 30.  As Sen. Kerry asserted during hearings on S.3304, Congress intends to pass new ADA laws before the end of the year.  With the finance and healthcare bills taken care of, and the fact that Markey's House bill, which had been stuck in subcommittee since June 2009, was marked up and sent to committee a couple weeks ago, we could indeed see a new law that would impose new ADA requirements on a broad spectrum of industry players, including content providers, programming distributors, device manufacturers and application developers.

• Email This
• Print
• Share Link

As expected from its tentative agenda released in late June, the Commission's July 15 open meeting will address three agenda items, including an NPRM to reform the Universal Service Rural Health Care Fund, and an NPRM and NOI to "increase value, utilization, and investment in the 2 GHz, Big LEO, and L-bands of the Mobile Satellite Service."   (The third agenda item deals with transitioning to an electronic tariff filing and formatting process.)

The July 15 Meeting Agenda can be downloaded here.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Last week the Federal Communications Commission released its tentative agenda for its July 15 open meeting.  According to the agenda, the Commission plans to discuss three items, two of which are related to the Commission's broadband efforts to implement the National Broadband Plan.  Specifically, the Commission intends to adopt a Rural Health Care Reform NPRM to "expand the reach and use of broadband connectivity by health care providers throughout the nation."  The Commission also intends to adopt a Spectrum Flexibility NPRM and NOI "seeking comment on ways to encourage investment in terrestrial broadband services within spectrum allocated to mobile satellite services, while maintaining robust mobile satellite capability."  (The third item relates to transitioning to an electronic tariff filing process.)

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

This morning the Federal Communications Commission held its monthly open meeting, this time to discuss the Commission's proposed reclassification efforts for broadband services.  In a three-to-two vote (Commissioners McDowell and Baker dissented), the Notice of Inquiry was adopted, and will seek comment on three ways to regulate broadband - under the Commission's Title I ancillary authority; under full Title II authority; or under the Chairman's "Third Way" approach which would impose limited Title II authority using the Commission's forbearance authority.  The NOI will also solicit the public for any other suggestions on how to regulate broadband.

It was announced during the meeting that comments to the NOI will be due by July 15, 2010, and reply comments due by August 12, 2010.

At this time, the NOI has not yet been released, but the FCC has released a News Release and statements from the Commissioners (but not the Chairman).  When the NOI is released, we will provide a more in-depth analysis.

UPDATE: The Notice of Inquiry has been released, and is available on the FCC's website with all the Commissioners' statements.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

This is a reminder that the FCC will hold its next open meeting on Thursday, June 17.  As we noted earlier, and as confirmed by the Commission's recent Meeting Agenda released this past Friday, this open meeting is expected to be quite entertaining, as it is dedicated to discussing a Notice of Inquiry to initiate an "open, public process to consider possible legal frameworks for broadband Internet services in order to promote innovation and investment, protect and empower consumers, and bring the benefits of broadband to all Americans" -- in other words, reclassification of broadband services as telecommunications services to implement the Commission's National Broadband Plan.

If you recall, last May, Chairman Genachowski released a statement indicating that, rather than reclassifying broadband services as telecommunications broadly, he would pursue a "third way approach" whereby only the "transmission components of broadband service" would be deemed telecommunications subject to select portions of Title II of the Communications Act.  This controversial approach will certainly be discussed at the June 17 meeting, in addition to any other proposals that the NOI may present.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The FCC has released its tentative agenda for its June 17, 2010 open meeting.  Unlike recent agendas for April and May, this one is written such that the June meeting will be dedicated to one, and only one, issue - the reclassification of broadband access service as a telecommunications service.*  According to the agenda, the Commission intends to adopt a Notice of Inquiry to "begin an open, public process to consider possible legal frameworks for broadband Internet services...."  In particular, the agenda highlights three questions from the proposed NOI, paraphrased as follows:

1. Whether the information service classification for broadband Internet service remains legally sound and adequate for the Commission to perform responsibly;

2. The legal and practical consequences of classifying broadband Internet service as a telecommunications service subject to all the provisions of Title II; and

3. The Commission's "third way" approach to regulating broadband Internet service (or at least the transmission components of such service).

We previously blogged about this issue already when the Chairman first announced his "third way" approach to reclassification (see an opinion on the "third way" approach here), so we won't get into it again now.  But rest assured, June 17 should make for an interesting and eventful day at the FCC.

* Of course, the Commission may include additional agenda items as the June 17 date nears, but this issue is obviously big enough to keep everyone busy for the entire meeting.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

At its May 20 open meeting today, the Commission continued its efforts to implement the recommendations of the Broadband Plan by unanimously adopting three more broadband-related proceedings to accompany the handful of proceedings adopted in April.

As expected, the Commission adopted a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to initiate reforms to the Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism (E-Rate) program to make broadband more accessible in schools and libraries and to cut red tape.  In addition to the anticipated items to streamline the E-Rate application process and index the e-rate cap to inflation, the FCC has decided to propose new rules to expand funding to wireless broadband connectivity for portable devices for students, as well as expanding funding for internal connections (possibly by eliminating the complex "2-in-5 year" rule). These items were originally slated for consideration in 1Q 2010. This proceeding follows the Commission's earlier adoption of its USF High-Cost NOI and NPRM in April.  (For further information, please contact Danielle Frappier.)

The Commission also adopted an Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to ensure nondiscriminatory, just and reasonable access to utility poles by broadband providers, an issue that Commissioner Clyburn referred to as the "nuts and bolts" of broadband access. The Order resolves certain utility pole access issues, while the FNPRM asks for additional comments on pole attachment rates, FCC enforcement, and access timeframes.  (For further information, please contact or Jim Tomlinson.)

Also adopted today was a Report and Order (News Release only, the actual R&O has not yet been released) enabling robust mobile broadband use of 25 MHz of spectrum in the 2.3 GHz wireless communications service (WCS) band. (The Commission also adopted a not-yet-released Second Report and Order implementing rules for terrestrial repeaters to provide greater certainty for both satellite radio and WCS licensees.) (For more information, please contact Brendan Holland.)

(The other two proceedings considered at the open meeting were the Local Number Portability Report and Order and the 14th edition of the Mobile Wireless Competition Report.)

UPDATE: The FCC has now released the Report and Order on WCS wireless broadband and the Second Report and Order on terrestrial repeaters.

 

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The FCC has released the final agenda for its May 20 open meeting, which will begin at 10:30 am in Room TW-C305.

As indicated in its tentative agenda released late last month, the Commission will consider five new agenda items, including three broadband-related items concerning mobile broadband use in the WCS band, reforms to the E-Rate program to make broadband more accessible to schools and libraries, and implementation of Broadband Plan recommendations regarding pole attachments (which we had commented on earlier).

 

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

In publicizing his decision to reclassify broadband as a Title II telecommunications service, FCC Chairman Genachowski took some pains to try to reassure the investment community that he was not making any sudden moves that should discourage broadband investment. But despite his efforts to try to limit the impact of his move, he has crossed a Rubicon that should never have been crossed. Broadband internet was never regulated under the Title II rules that grew up for the monopoly “Ma Bell” era, and for good reason.  It was because the Internet was allowed to grow in an unregulated competitive market that attracted massive investment by competing providers and delivered the astonishing broadband throughput that enables all the cool Internet business models. No student of technology should feel comforted when the government decides that technological innovation has gone far enough, and we can stop now and write it into rule. No student of regulatory history should be sanguine about promises to limit the scope of government once it asserts control. Every student of government should be alarmed when the government picks favorites, asserting control over the selected few parties who built the “core” of the Internet to today’s capabilities, to benefit its favored parties at the “edge,” claiming all the while that it is not touching the Internet or free speech, when it is in fact doing both. It has been only weeks since we and Google collectively scolded China for centralized government controls which are anathema to the Internet—and now we are inviting centralized government controls when it favors Google. We should be troubled, too, by some of the reasoning offered. It conspicuously avoids inconvenient facts, such as broadband never having been subject to “Ma Bell” regulation. It seeks to write for itself a new Title of the Communications Act that Congress never adopted, ignoring a Congressional mandate to leave the Internet “unfettered” by regulation. While the Commission will be inviting further comment, matters this profound should not be left to an unelected agency, no matter how bright and well-meaning. If we are to reconstruct communications and media law, we should be turning to Congress. And if we are straying towards a world in which the government decides which speech is free and which is not, we should be turning to the Bill of Rights to remind us of why the government is supposed to limit its reach in the first place.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Following reports yesterday that Chairman Genachowski was now prepared to assert FCC jurisdiction over the Internet, the FCC released the Chairman's statement proposing a "third way" to regulate the Internet.  As anticipated by earlier reports, the Chairman's statement reveals that the FCC would not seek to impose Title II on Internet services in its entirety.  Rather, the FCC would only recognize the "transmission component of broadband service" as a "telecommunications service."  In addition, the FCC would only apply a "handful" of Title II provisions to Internet networks, specifically, Sections 201 (just and reasonable service and charges), 202 (non-discrimination), 208 (complaint procedures), 222 (customer privacy), 254 (universal service) and 255 (disability access).  In doing so, the Commission would forbear from applying many other sections of the Communications Act that, according to the Chairman, are "unnecessary and inappropriate for broadband access service." 

The "third way" approach is the FCC's attempt to find some middle ground between the status quo (Title I ancillary jurisdiction) and full reclassification of Internet access service as a telecommunications service under Title II.  Indeed, the Chairman admitted that "the extreme alternatives to this light-touch approach are unacceptable," and that "FCC policies should not include regulating Internet content, constraining reasonable network management practices of broadband providers, or stifling new business models or managed services that are pro-consumer and foster innovation and competition."

The statement follows reports that Representative Waxman and Senator Rockefeller had delivered a letter to the Chairman yesterday indicating their support for the FCC's regulatory oversight of the Internet, which may have helped sway the Chairman to adopt this middle ground.  The statement also follows a letter from Commissioner McDowell to Rep. Waxman providing a brief history of the regulatory classification of Internet access services.  In that letter, Commissioner McDowell emphasized that, following the Supreme Court's Brand X decision upholding the FCC's classification of cable modem service as an information service, the Commission "without dissent" consistently classified broadband services as information services in the context of wireline, powerline, and wireless.

UPDATE: The FCC has also released an accompanying statement from the FCC's General Counsel Austin Schlick that provides the "legal thinking" behind the "third way" approach. 

In addition, Commissioner Copps released his statement on the proposal, in which he admitted that he "would have preferred plain and simple Title II reclassification through a declaratory ruling and limited, targeted forbearance."

UPDATE: Commissioners McDowell and Baker have released their joint statement, finding the Chairman's proposal "disappointing" and one that "deeply concerns" them.  Notably, the two Commissioners caution that the proposal will be shot down by the courts as exceeding the FCC's authority absent a "specific mandate from Congress."  If that is the case, the Waxman and Rockefeller letter to the Chairman would suggest that some members of Congress would then try to give the FCC that mandate.

UPDATE: Commissioner Clyburn's statement is now available on the FCC's website, which, not surprisingly, supports the Chairman's proposal.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Last week, the FCC's Order on Reconsideration and FNPRM regarding Mobile Voice and Data Roaming (formally adopted at the Commission's April 21 open meeting) were published in the Federal Register.  As a result, the clock has started for comments to the FNPRM, with initial comments due June 14 and reply comments due July 12.  (As for the Order on Reconsideration, which eliminates the home roaming exclusion for voice and related services (currently codified at 47 C.F.R. 20.12), the rule amendment goes into effect on May 28, 2010.)

As of this posting, the FCC's other broadband proceedings from the April 21 open meeting (i.e., USF Reform, Cable Gateway/CableCARD, Broadband Survivability, and Cyber Security Certification) have not been published, and thus, the comment dates have not been set yet.  We will, of course, let you know when that happens.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The FCC has released its tentative agenda for its next open meeting to be held on May 20, 2010.  The agenda identifies five items, two of which are not directly related to the Broadband Plan -- Mobile Wireless Competition Report and Local Number Portability Report and Order.  (Note that the Wireless Report follows the FCC's last wireless competition report, released on Jan. 16, 2009, which relied primarily on 2007 data.  It is not clear from the tentative agenda whether this latest edition will be based on 2008 or more recent data.)

The remaining three broadband-related items are:

(1) WCS-SDARS Report and Order (enabling broadband use in WCS band)

(2) E-Rate NPRM (initiating reforms to E-Rate program)

(3) Pole Attachments Order and FNPRM (ensuring "nondiscriminatory, just, and reasonable access to utility poles")

Like its tentative agenda for the April 21 meeting, the FCC has not provided much more detail than this.  In the meantime, you can refer to DWT's Advisory on the Broadband Plan for further discussion of these upcoming issues and what to expect in these proceedings.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The FCC's April 21 open meeting was dominated by efforts to implement the National Broadband Plan.  Not surprisingly, the Commissioners voted unanimously to adopt all six agenda items that had already been announced on several occassions prior to today's meeting - USF Reform (NOI and NPRM, see also earlier blog post on these proceedings); Mobile Voice and Data Roaming (Order on Recon and FNPRM); Cable Gateways and CableCARD (NOI and FNPRM, see also the recently released DWT Advisory); Broadband Network Survivability (NOI); and Cyber Security Certification (NOI).  Except for the only Order issued today (which eliminated the home exclusion to wireless roaming), the proceedings adopted by the Commissioners initiate (and in some cases, like CableCARD, re-ignite) proceedings to further develop the record in anticipation of future amendments and new rules.  Not explicitly laid out by the presenters during the meeting, however, but alluded to by the Commissioners, were the two big elephants in the room -- Title II and the ramifications of the Comcast case.  In particular, Commissioners Copps and McDowell acknowledged that questions regarding the FCC's jurisdiction over broadband would likely be a central focus in the FNPRM to consider extending roaming obligations to mobile broadband services.  Indeed, that FNPRM specifically seeks comment on these issues, including the "significance, if any" of the Comcast case in this - and effectively all other - broadband proceedings. 

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The Commission has released its agenda for the April 21 open meeting (10:30 am, Room TW-C305).  The agenda mirrors the FCC's earlier tentative agenda released on March 31. 

According to the agenda, the Commission will consider six issues related to the Broadband Plan: (1) NOI and NPRM on USF reform, (2) Order on Reconsidation and FNPRM on mobile roaming arrangements for voice and broadband mobile services, (3) NOI on the availability of smart video devices for MVPD networks (ie, network gateways), (4) FNPRM on changes to the CableCARD rules, (5) NOI on broadband network survivability and security, and (6) NOI on establishing a cybersecurity certification program.  For more analyses on these and other broadband issues, please read our DWT Advisory on the Broadband Plan.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

In case you missed it, the Senate Commerce Committee's hearing with Chairman Genchowski on the Broadband Plan is now available on the Commerce Committee's website.  The FCC has also released the Chairman's prepared statement for the hearing.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Although the DC Circuit's recent decision in Comcast v. FCC has raised significant questions concerning the Commission's jurisdiction over Internet access (read the DWT Advisory on the case), the Commission has moved forward with releasing a comprehensive schedule that proposes over 60 proceedings, workshops and other efforts to implement the recommendations in the Broadband Plan. The schedule anticipates the release of 16 reports and orders by the end of 2010 alonw, nine of which are expected to be released in the second quarter, in addition to numerous other proposed NPRMs, NOIs and FNPRMs. Some notable issues to be considered this year include pole attachments, TV white spaces, hearing aid compatibility and a clarification on interconnection. The FCC also intends to initiate an NPRM on CableCARD and an NOI on smart video devices in the second quarter of 2010, as well as NPRMs on USF, texting, intercarrier compensation and smart video devices by the end of 2010.

The 2010 schedule and the more comprehensive agenda which discusses the 60+ proposed action items, are available on the FCC’s broadband.gov website.  However, like the FCC's March 31 tentative agenda,  this comprehensive agenda still only offers teasers of what to expect in the upcoming proceedings, so there is not much more to report than what is available. (You can, in the meantime, refer to DWT’s Advisory on the Broadband Plan for more detailed analyses of the issues.)

The Chairman also took this opportunity to respond to reports that the DC Circuit's decision could derail the FCC’s broadband agenda. The Chairman is quoted as saying that the court’s decision “does not change our broadband policy goals, or the ultimate authority of the FCC to act to achieve those goals.”  That, of course, remains to be seen -- as we concluded in our DWT Advisory, the court’s ruling likely sets the stage for further rulemakings, court cases and federal legislation to address, and clarify, the FCC’s regulatory role in high-speed Internet access, including a potential showdown on placing the Internet under Title II regulation.

 

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The FCC has released its tentative agenda for its next open meeting on April 21, 2010. The agenda identifies six potential items on the FCC’s plate related to the Broadband Plan. Specifically, the agenda indicates that the FCC plans to initiate the following proceedings at its April 21 meeting:

            (1) USF Reform NPRM and NOI

            (2) Mobile Roaming Order FNPRM

            (3) Network Gateway NOI

            (4) CableCARD NPRM

            (5) Broadband Network Survivability NOI

            (6) Cybersecurity Certification NOI

 

The agenda only provides brief, one-sentence summaries of what these proceedings will entail, so there is not too much to say for now. Please refer to DWT’s Advisory on the Broadband Plan for more further discussion of the Plan’s details and what you can expect in these proceedings.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation has rescheduled its review of the National Broadband Plan to April 14, 2010.  This hearing was previously scheduled for Tuesday, March 23, 2010. Currently, Chairman Genachowski is the only witness scheduled to appear.  More meeting information is available on the Commerce Committee's website

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The FCC has made available the Chairman’s and the Commissioners’ prepared statements for the March 25 hearing before the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Communications, Technology and the Internet.

• Chairman Genachowski
• Commissioner Copps
• Commissioner Clyburn
• Commissioner Baker
• Commissioner McDowell

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The Senate Commerce Committee cancelled its hearing on the National Broadband Plan, which was originally scheduled for March 23, most likely due to the healthcare debates.  Reports indicate that the Committee will try and reschedule before the Easter break. We will post the new date as soon as it is released.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

By Robert G. Scott, Jr. and James M. Smith

On March 16, 2010, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) presented to Congress its long-anticipated National Broadband Plan, as mandated by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the “Recovery Act”). Thirteen months in the making and weighing in at nearly 400 pages, “Connecting America: The National Broadband Plan” (the “Plan”) has occupied a disproportionate share of the FCC’s time and energy for the last year and, given the breadth and sheer quantity of its analysis and proposals, it will continue to be the single greatest focus of the agency for years to come.

Section 6001 of the Recovery Act, signed into law by President Obama on Feb. 17, 2009, less than a month after his inauguration, mandated the dispersal of $7.2 billion through grant and loan programs to expand broadband deployment to, and adoption by, unserved and underserved areas and vulnerable populations. Those programs—the Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP) administered by the Department of Commerce and the Broadband Initiatives Program (BIP) administered by the Department of Agriculture—are underway, and by law, all of these grants must be awarded by September 30, and the projects completed within three years thereafter.

But Subsection 6001(k) of the Recovery Act also directed the FCC to submit to Congress a National Broadband Plan for the longer term, to pick up where these broadband deployment and other short-term projects leave off “to ensure that all people of the United States have access to broadband capability and [to] establish benchmarks for meeting that goal.”

Congress ordered the FCC to include (1) “analysis of the most effective and efficient mechanisms for ensuring broadband access” by all Americans, (2) “a detailed strategy for achieving affordability of such service and maximum utilization of broadband infrastructure” by the public, (3) “an evaluation of the status of deployment of broadband service, including progress of projects supported by the [BTOP and BIP] grants,” and (4) “a plan for use of broadband infrastructure and services in advancing consumer welfare, civic participation, public safety and homeland security, community development, health care delivery, energy independence and efficiency, education, worker training, private sector investment, entrepreneurial activity, job creation and economic growth, and other national purposes.”

Continue reading DWT"s Analysis of the National Broadband Plan.

Download the National Broadband Plan. 

You can also directly access DWT's analysis of specific topics under the National Broadband Plan here:

• Broadband Deployment
• High-Cost Universal Service
• Intercarrier Compensation
• Mobile Broadband Services and Spectrum Initiatives
• Infrastructure Deployment -- Poles, Conduits, and Rights of Way
• Navigation Devices
• Privacy Advisory
• Cybersecurity
• E-Rate Upgrade
• Broadband Adoption
• Accessibility (Persons with Disabilities
• Smart Grid
• Consumer Disclosure
• Broadband Availability in Tribal Communities
• E-Health Records

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link